3D Mammogram Reconstruction and Tumor Localization via 2D U-Net–GAN

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14500/aro.12766

Keywords:

Three-dimensional mammography reconstruction, Tumor localization, U-Net-generator with adversarial refinement, Single-View Mammogram

Abstract

Conventional two-dimensional (2D) mammography compresses complex breast anatomy into a single projection, obscuring lesions through tissue overlap and limiting reliable tumor sizing. Although tomosynthesis and computed tomography recover depth information, these modalities are not universally available and add dose, time, and cost. We propose a single-view 2D-to-three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction framework that couples a 3D U-Net with a Generative Adversarial Network (GAN) to synthesize anatomically coherent 3D mammograms from a single 2D input. The end-to-end pipeline performs (i) seed stack formation and normalization, (ii) adversarial 3D reconstruction, and (iii) lightweight post-processing—Gaussian smoothing, global thresholding, and 26-connected component analysis—to localize regions of interest (ROI) and compute voxel-accurate lesion volumes in mm³/cm³ from pixel and slice spacings. Training combines weighted GAN and reconstruction losses to balance perceptual realism with structural fidelity. On a held-out test set, the method achieves a mean squared error of 0.0059, a mean peak signal-to-noise ratio of 24.13 dB, a mean absolute error of 0.0283, and a structural similarity index of 0.9296, outperforming interpolation and non-adversarial 3D U-Net baselines. Qualitative renderings show preserved parenchymal textures, smooth interslice transitions, and precise ROI overlays, while a red isosurface visualization highlights the 3D lesion extent for volumetry. The approach is simple to train, reproducible, and compatible with standard imaging toolchains, delivering clinically actionable volumetric measurements without multiview acquisition. Future work includes multiview supervision (craniocaudal and mediolateral oblique) to strengthen depth consistency, uncertainty maps to qualify reconstructions, and learned ROI segmentation with topology-aware objectives, advancing low-overhead 3D support in routine mammography.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Amin, A., Dinesh Acharya, U., Koteshwara P., Siddalingaswamy, P.C., and Mathew S., 2025. A systematic literature review on mammography: Deep learning techniques for breast cancer detection with global and Asian perspectives. BMC Cancer, 25(1627), pp.1-23.

Aootaphao, S., Puttawibul, P., Thajchayapong, P., and Thongvigitmanee, S.S., 2024. Artifact suppression for breast specimen imaging in micro CBCT using deep learning. BMC Medical Imaging, 24(1), p.34.

Bahl, M., Kshirsagar, A., Pohlman, S., and Lehman, C.D., 2025. Traditional versus modern approaches to screening mammography: A comparison of computer-assisted detection for synthetic 2D mammography versus an artificial intelligence algorithm for digital breast tomosynthesis. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 210, pp.529-537.

Berti, A., Scapicchio, C., Iacconi, C., Trombadori, C.M.L., Fantacci, M.E., Retico, A., and Colantonio S., 2025. An explainable-by-design end-to-end AI framework based on prototypical part learning for lesion detection and classification in digital breast Tomosynthesis images. Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal, 27, pp.2649-2660.

Brahimetaj, R., Willekens, I., Massart, A., Forsyth, R., Cornelis, J., Mey, J., and Jansen B., 2022. Improved automated early detection of breast cancer based on high-resolution 3D micro-CT microcalcification images. BMC Cancer, 22(1), p.162.

Bushberg, J.T., Seibert, J.A., Leidholdt, E.M., and Boone, J.M., 2012. The Essential Physics of Medical Imaging. 3rd ed. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA, Available from: https://www.the essential physics for medical imaging,3rd-ed-pdf [Last accessed on 2025 Oct 13].

Gonzalez, R.C., and Woods, R.E., 2018. Digital Image Processing. 4th ed. Pearson, Harlow. Available from : https://www.digital image processing,4e [Last accessed on 2025 Nov 20].

Goodfellow, I., Pouget-Abadie, J., Mirza, M., Xu, B., Warde-Farley, D., Ozair, S., Courville, A., and Bengio, Y., 2014. Generative adversarial nets. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 27, pp.2672-2680.

Gupta, N., Kubicek, J., Penhaker, M., and Derawi, M., 2025. A novel diagnostic framework for breast cancer: Combining deep learning with mammogram-DBT feature fusion. Results in Engineering, 25, p.103836.

He, Q., Wang, X., Cai, C., Zhu, L., Zhang, B., Yang, G., Jian, W., Wang, L., and Zhen, X., 2025. A hierarchical multi-channel multi-modality fusion strategy for integrating digital mammography and synthesized digital breast tomosynthesis for breast mass discrimination. Complex and Intelligent Systems, 11(9), p.384.

Idas, S.J.P., Hemalatha, K., Naveenkumar, J., and Devadas, T.J., 2025. Recent trends on mammogram breast density analysis using deep learning models: Neoteric review. Artificial Intelligence Review, 58(8), p.240.

Isola, P., Zhu, J.Y., Zhou, T., and Efros, A.A., 2017. Image-to-Image Translation with Conditional Adversarial Networks. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). pp.1125-1134.

Karmakar, A., Shaw, A., Rakshit, S., Chakraborty, S., Biswas, S., Sahoo, S., and Biswas, S., 2025. The role of generative AI in medical image synthesis: A review. SN Applied Sciences, 7(10), p.1219.

Ko, Z.Y.G., Li, Y., Liu, J., Ji, H., Qiu, A., and Chen, N., 2024. DOTnet 2.0: Deep learning network for diffuse optical tomography image reconstruction. Intelligent Biomedical Engineering, 9, p.100133.

Lee, R.S., Gimenez, F, Hoogi, A., Miyake, K.K., Gorovoy, M., and Rubin, D.L., 2017. A curated mammography data set for use in computer-aided detection and diagnosis research. Scientific Data, 4, p.170177.

Niu, H., Li, L., Wang, X., and Xu, H., 2025. The value of predicting breast cancer with a DBT 2.5D deep learning model. Discover Oncology, 16(1) p.420.

Park, J., Chledowski, J., Jastrzebski, S., Witowski, J., Xu, Y., Du, L., Gaddam, S., Kim, E., Lewin, A., Parikh, U., Plaunova, A., Chen, S., Millet, A., Park, J.,… & Geras, K.J., 2024. An efficient deep neural network to classify large 3D images with small objects. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 43(1), pp.351-365.

Shah, D., Khan, M.A.U., Abrar, M., Amin, F., Alkhamees, B.F., and AlSalman, H., 2024. Enhancing the quality and authenticity of synthetic mammogram images for improved breast cancer detection. IEEE Access, 12, pp.12189-12198.

Xiao, B., Sun, H., Meng, Y., Peng, Y., Yang, X., Chen, S., Yan, Z., and Zheng, J., 2021. Classification of microcalcification clusters in digital breast tomosynthesis using ensemble convolutional neural network. Molecular Medicine Reports, 20(1), p.71.

Zijlstra, F., and While, P.T., 2024. Deep-learning-based image reconstruction with limited data: Generating synthetic raw data using deep learning. Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine, 37, pp.1059-1076.

Published

2026-07-17

How to Cite

Mamand, S. S. and Abdulla, A. I. (2026) “3D Mammogram Reconstruction and Tumor Localization via 2D U-Net–GAN”, ARO-THE SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL OF KOYA UNIVERSITY, 14(2), pp. 1–7. doi: 10.14500/aro.12766.
Received 2025-11-29
Accepted 2026-04-16
Published 2026-07-17

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.